Abstract

The basic method for analyzing the degree of DNA fragmentation caused by genotoxic factors is gel electrophoresis of single cells (single cell gel electrophoresis), also called the comet assay. The comet assay enables the analysis of the level of several different DNA modifications. The basic testing procedure has been only slightly modified. This method helps identify single-strand and double-strand DNA cracks, as well as any chemical and enzymatic modifications that can potentially turn into cracks in DNA or chromatids. The comet assay makes it possible to detect DNA damage at the level of single cells. It can be employed in analyses of any tissues which provide cellular suspensions. Analysed cells are submerged in agarose on a microscope slide. DNA is what is left after proteins have been broken down. The slide is then subjected to electrophoresis and stained with a fluorescent dye. A “comet-like” image is obtained. The “head” is the cell fixation site prior to lysis; the “tail” represents damaged DNA fragments. The extent of DNA damage is reflected in the length of the tail and the amount of DNA contained in it. The assay finds research applications in the following fields: genetic toxicology, monitoring of DNA repair following chemotherapy and radiotherapy, ecotoxicology, animal and human nourishment, biomonitoring of genotoxicity, epidemiology and assessment of material deposited in sperm and blood banks.

References

• 1. Abd-Allah G.A., el-Fayoumi R.I., Smith M.J., Heckmann R.A., O’NeillK.L.: A comparative evaluation of aflatoxin B1 genotoxicity infish models using the Comet assay. Mutat. Res., 1999; 446: 181-188
  Google Scholar
• 2. Anitha B., Chandra N., Gopinath P.M., Durairaj G.: Genotoxicityevaluation of heat shock in gold fish (Carassius auratus). Mutat. Res.,2000; 469: 1-8
  Google Scholar
• 3. Arias E.: Spontaneous sister chomatid exchanges in chicken embryos.Hereditas, 2000; 133: 263-266
  Google Scholar
• 4. Ashby J., Tinwell H., Lefevre P.A., Browne M.A.: The single cell gelelectrophoresis assay for induced DNA damage (comet assay): measurementof tail length and moment. Mutagenesis, 1995; 10: 85-90
  Google Scholar
• 5. Belpaeme K., Cooreman K., Kirsch-Volders M.: Development andvalidation of the in vivo alkaline comet assay for detecting genomicdamage in marine flatfish. Mutat. Res., 1998; 415: 167-184
  Google Scholar
• 6. Collins A.R.: The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles,applications, and limitations. Mol. Biotechnol., 2004; 26: 249-261
  Google Scholar
• 7. Di Berardino D., Lioi M.B., Scarfi M.R., Jovino V., Marigliano P.:Spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in mitotic chromosomesof cattle (Bos taurus). Genet. Sel. Evol., 1995; 27: 385-393
  Google Scholar
• 8. Faullimel C., Ennahar S., Aoude-Werner D., Guterl P., MarchioniE.: DNA comet assay for the detection of time-temperature abuseduring the storage of poultry. J. Food Prot., 2005; 68: 1414-1420
  Google Scholar
• 9. Fraser L., Strzeżek J.: The use of comet assay to assess DNA integrityof boar spermatozoa following liquid preservation at 5oC and16oC. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol., 2004; 42: 49-55
  Google Scholar
• 10. Gedik C.M., Ewen S.W., Collins A.R.: Single-cell gel electrophoresisapplied to the analysis of UV-C damage and its repair in humancells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 1992; 62: 313-320
  Google Scholar
• 11. Górecka K.M., Szyfter K., Gawęcki W.: Brak aktywności genotoksycznejpreparatu paklitaksel w limfocytach eksponowanych in vitrona terapeutyczne dawki leku. Współcz. Onkol., 2003; 7: 2260-2263
  Google Scholar
• 12. Hsu T.C., Johnston D.A., Cherry L.M., Ramkissoon D., Schantz S.P.,Jessup J.M., Winn R.J., Shirley L., Furlong C.: Sensitivity to genotoxiceffects of bleomycin in humans: possible relationship to environmentalcarcinogenesis. Int. J. Cancer, 1989; 43: 403-409
  Google Scholar
• 13. Hu J.H., Li Q.W., Jiang Z.L., Li W.Y.: Effects of different extendersand DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following freezing-thawing.Cryobiology, 2008; 57: 257-262
  Google Scholar
• 14. Jałoszyński P., Szyfter G.: Comet assay – nowoczesna technikaw badaniach genotoksykologicznych. W: Na pograniczu chemii i biologii.Tom III, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza,Poznań 1999, 452-459; 466-469
  Google Scholar
• 15. Jurczyk Ł., Lewandowska R., Brzuzan P., Woźnicki P.: Zastosowaniemetody kometowej w wykrywaniu genotoksyczności substancjichemicznych u ryb. Komunikaty Rybackie, 2003; 5: 20-22
  Google Scholar
• 16. Kapka L., Olewińska E., Kozłowska A., Kwapuliński J.: Wykorzystanietestu kometowego jako wskaźnika środowiskowej i zawodowejekspozycji na czynniki o działaniu prooksydacyjnym i genotoksycznym.Environ. Med., 2008; 11: 116-123
  Google Scholar
• 17. Końca K., Lankoff A., Banasik A., Lisowska H., Kuszewski T., GóźdźS., Koza Z., Wojcik A.: A cross-platform public domain PC image–analysis program for the comet assay. Mutat. Res., 2003; 534: 15-20
  Google Scholar
• 18. Kopjar N., Garaj-Vrhovac V., Milas I.: Assessment of chemotherapy-inducedDNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes ofcancer patients using the alkaline comet assay. Teratog. Carcinog.Mutagen., 2002; 22: 13-30
  Google Scholar
• 19. Kotłowska M., Dietrich G., Wojtczak M., Karol H., CiereczkoA.: Effects of liquid storage on amidase activity, DNA fragmentationand motility of turkey spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 2007;67: 276-286
  Google Scholar
• 20. Kozłowska J., Łaczmańska I.: Niestabilność genetyczna – jej znaczeniew procesie powstawania nowotworów oraz diagnostyka laboratoryjna.J. Oncol., 2010; 60: 548-553
  Google Scholar
• 21. Knasmuller S., Steinkellner H., Hirschl A.M., Rabot S., Nobis E.C.,Kassie F.: Impact of bacteria in dairy products and of the intestinalmicroflora on the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of heterocyclicaromatic amines. Mutat. Res., 2001; 480-481: 129-138
  Google Scholar
• 22. Liptói K., Hidas A., Rouvier R.: Investigation of chromosomeabnormalities and early embryonic mortality in goose lines. ActaBiol. Hung., 2005; 56: 53-65
  Google Scholar
• 23. Møller P.: Assessment of reference values for DNA damage detectedby the comet assay in human blood cell DNA. Mutat. Res.,2006; 612: 84-104
  Google Scholar
• 24. Ostling O., Johanson K.J.: Microelectrophoretic study of radiationinducedDNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochem.Biophys. Res. Commun., 1984; 123: 291-298
  Google Scholar
• 25. Pérez-Llano B., Enciso M., Garcia-Casado P., Sala R., Gosálvez J.:Sperm DNA fragmentation in boars is delayed or abolished by usingsperm extenders. Theriogenology, 2006; 66: 2137-2143
  Google Scholar
• 26. Rydberg B., Johanson K.J.: Estimation of DNA strand break in singlemammalian cells. W: Hanawalt P.C, Friedberg E.C., Fox C.F. (red.),DNA Repair Mechanisms Academic Press, New York, 1978; 465-468
  Google Scholar
• 27. Singh N.P., McCoy M.T., Tice R.R., Schneider E.L.: A simple techniquefor quantitation of low levels of damage in individual cells.Exp. Cell Res., 1988; 175: 184-191
  Google Scholar
• 28. Singh N.P., Muller C.H., Berger R.E.: Effects of age on DNA double-strandbreaks and apoptosis in human sperm. Fertil. Steril.,2003; 80: 1420-1430
  Google Scholar
• 29. Sokolovic M., Garaj-Vrhovac V., Ramic S., Simpraga B.: Chickennucleated blood cells as a cellular model for genotoxicitytesting using the comet assay. Food Chem. Toxicol., 2007; 45:2165-2170
  Google Scholar
• 30. Tomczyk J., Olejnik A., Kowalska K., Białas W., Grajek W.: Ocenaaktywności cytotoksycznej ekstrudatów fasolowo-kukurydzianychwzględem nowotworowych komórek nabłonka jelitowego. Żywność,2008; 6: 40-54
  Google Scholar
• 31. Widłak M.: Struktura chromatyny a powstawanie i naprawauszkodzeń DNA. Kosmos, 2002; 51: 5-12
  Google Scholar
• 32. Wójcik E., Andraszek K., Ciszewska M., Smalec E.: Sister chromatidexchange as an index of chromosome instability in chondrodystrophicchickens (Gallus domesticus). Poult. Sci., 2013; 92: 84-89
  Google Scholar
• 33. Wójcik E., Andraszek K., Gryzińska M., Witkowski A., PałyszkaM., Smalec E.: Sister chromatid exchange in Greenleg Partridge andPolbar hens covered by the gene-pool protection program for farmanimals in Poland. Poult. Sci., 2012; 91: 2424-2430
  Google Scholar
• 34. Wójcik E., Smalec E.: Wymiana chromatyd siostrzanych w chromosomach.Kosmos, 2010; 59: 513-526
  Google Scholar
• 35. Wójcik E., Smalec E., Góral K.: Łamliwe miejsca chromosomu.Kosmos, 2009; 58: 135-142
  Google Scholar

Full text