Abstract

The dynamic development of knowledge in the field of probiotics was commenced at the beginning of the 20th century. Since then, many ways of their possible usage in medicine have been established. In accordance with the WHO, probiotics are live microorganisms, which if applied in adequate amounts may benefit the host. Among probiotics, fungi and bacteria are distinguished, and mechanisms of action of these organisms in the oral cavity and gut are parallel. Application in dentistry, in prophylaxis and treatment of oral diseases is still not well known. Most commonly, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium are applied. The aim of the study was to collect and systematize the latest information about probiotics and their role in pathomechanisms of dental caries, gingivitis and periodontitis, candidiasis, and malodour. Based on the analyzed literature, it can be concluded that mechanisms of cariogenic pathogen inhibition using probiotics are still not well understood. The new research trend is based on application of probiotics which can naturally displace cariogenic bacteria in the oral cavity and influence oral health in adults and children. The results of studies also confirmed the beneficial role of probiotics in reduction of the bacterial population in periodontitis and halitosis. Long-term observation and a properly designed study protocol will allow us to answer many questions concerning substitution of one strain of bacteria by another.

References

• 1. Ahola A.J., Yli-Knuuttila H., Suomalainen T., Poussa T., AhlströmA., Meurman J.H., Korpela R.: Short-term consumption of probiotic–containing cheese and its effect on dental caries risk factors. Arch.Oral Biol., 2002; 47: 799-804
  Google Scholar
• 2. Badet C., Thebaud N.B.: Ecology of lactobacilli in the oral cavity:a review of literature. Open Microbiol. J., 2008; 2: 38-48
  Google Scholar
• 3. Balakrishnan M., Simmonds R.S., Tagg J.R.: Dental caries is a preventableinfectious disease. Aust. Dent. J., 2000; 45: 235-245
  Google Scholar
• 4. Barretto C., Alvarez-Martin P., Foata F., Renault P., Berger B.: Genomesequence of the lantibiotic bacteriocin producer Streptococcussalivarius strain K12. J. Bacteriol., 2012; 194: 5959-5960
  Google Scholar
• 5. Bayrak S., Okte Z., Fidanci U.R.: Relationship between caries anddental plaque composition. Am. J. Dent., 2011; 24: 45-48
  Google Scholar
• 6. Burton J.P., Chilcott C.N., Tagg J.R.: The rationale and potentialfor the reduction of oral malodour using Streptococcus salivariusprobiotics. Oral Dis., 2005; 11: S29-S31
  Google Scholar
• 7. Burton J.P., Drummond B.K., Chilcott C.N., Tagg J.R., ThomsonW.M., Hale J.D., Wescombe P.A.: Influence of the probiotic Streptococcussalivarius strain M18 on indices of dental health in children:a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Med. Microbiol.,2013; 62: 875-884
  Google Scholar
• 8. Burton J.P, Wescombe P.A., Macklaim J.M., Chai M.H., MacDonaldK., Hale J.D., Tagg J.R., Reid G., Gloor G.B., Cadieux P.A.: Persistenceof the oral probiotic Streptococcus salivarius M18 is dose dependentand megaplasmid transfer can augment their bacteriocin productionand adhesion characteristics. PLoS One, 2013; 8: e65991
  Google Scholar
• 9. Caglar E., Kuscu O.O., Cildir S.K., Kuvvetli S.S., Sandalli N.: A probioticlozenge administered medical device and its effect on salivarymutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent.,2008; 18: 35-39
  Google Scholar
• 10. Caglar E., Topcuoglu N., Cildir S.K., Sandalli N., Kulekci G.: Oralcolonization by Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 after exposure toprobiotics. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent., 2009; 19: 377-381
  Google Scholar
• 11. Chang H.S., Walsh L.J., Freer T.J.: The effect of orthodontic treatmenton salivary flow, pH, buffer capacity, and levels of mutansstreptococci and lactobacilli. Aust. Orthod. J., 1999; 15: 229-234
  Google Scholar
• 12. Characklis W.G., Marshall K.C. (eds.): Biofilms, John Wiley &Sons, Inc. New York 1990
  Google Scholar
• 13. Chhour K.L., Nadkarni M.A., Byun R., Martin F.E., Jacques N.A.,Hunter N.: Molecular analysis of microbial diversity in advancedcaries. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2005; 43: 843-849
  Google Scholar
• 14. Chiang S.S., Pan T.M.: Beneficial effects of Lactobacillus paracaseisubsp. paracasei NTU 101 and its fermented products. Appl.Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2012; 93: 903-916
  Google Scholar
• 15. Chilcott C.N., Tagg J.R.: Antimicrobial composition. Patent No.WO2003070919 (2007)
  Google Scholar
• 16. Choudhari S., Mopagar V.: Probiotic way of dental caries prevention.Int. J. Contemp. Dent., 2011; 2: 59-64
  Google Scholar
• 17. Clarke J.K.: On the bacterial factor in the aetiology of dental caries. Br. J. Exp. Pathol., 1924; 5: 141-147
  Google Scholar
• 18. Czerwionka-Szaflarska M., Łoś-Rycharska E.: Co należy wiedziećo Lactobacillus reuteri. Pediatr. Pol., 2011; 86: 410-420
  Google Scholar
• 19. Darveau R.P.: Periodontitis: a polymicrobial disruption of hosthomeostasis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2010; 8: 481-490
  Google Scholar
• 20. Darveau R.P., Hajshengallis G., Curtis M.A.: Porphyromonas gingivalisas a potential community activist for disease. J. Dent. Res.,2012; 91: 816-820
  Google Scholar
• 21. de Vrese M., Schrezenmeir J.: Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics.Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., 2008; 111: 1-66
  Google Scholar
• 22. Fejerskov O., Kidd E.: Dental Caries. The disease and its clinicalmanagement, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008
  Google Scholar
• 23. Forssten S.D., Björklund M., Ouwehand A.C.: Streptococcus mutans,caries and simulation models. Nutrients, 2010; 2: 290-298
  Google Scholar
• 24. Frederick J.R., Sarkar J., McDowell J.V., Marconi R.T.: Molecularsignaling mechanisms of the periopathogen, Treponema denticola.J. Dent. Res., 2011; 90: 1155-1163
  Google Scholar
• 25. Garrido D., Ruiz-Moyano S., Jimenez-Espinoza R., Eom H.J., BlockD.E., Mills D.A: Utilization of galactooligosaccharides by Bifidobacteriumlongum subsp. infantis isolates. Food Microbiol., 2013; 33:262-270
  Google Scholar
• 26. Graves D.T., Oates T., Garlet G.P.: Review of osteoimmunologyand the host response in endodontic and periodontal lesions. J. OralMicrobiol., 2011; 3: 5304
  Google Scholar
• 27. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. Report ofa Joint FAO/WHO Working Group. London Ontario, Canada 2002;April 30 and May 1
  Google Scholar
• 28. Guyonnet D., Chassany O., Ducrotte P., Picard C., Mouret M.,Mercier C.H., Matuchansky C.: Effect of a fermented milk containingBifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010 on the health-related qualityof life and symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome in adults in primarycare: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 2007; 26: 475-486
  Google Scholar
• 29. Hahn C.L., Falkler W.A. Jr., Minah G.E.: Microbiological studies ofcarious dentine from human teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Arch.Oral Biol., 1991; 36: 147-153
  Google Scholar
• 30. Hajishengallis G., Lambris J.D.: Microbial manipulation of receptorcrosstalk in innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2011; 11:187-200
  Google Scholar
• 31. Hasslöf P., West C.E., Videhult F.K., Brandelius C., Stecksén-BlicksC.: Early intervention with probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei F19has no long-term effect on caries experience. Caries Res., 2013; 47:559-565
  Google Scholar
• 32. Hata S., Mayanagi H.: Acid diffusion through extracellular polysaccharidesproduced by various mutants of Streptococcus mutans.Arch. Oral Biol., 2003; 48: 431-438
  Google Scholar
• 33. Haukioja A.: Probiotics and oral health. Eur. J. Dent., 2010; 4:348-355
  Google Scholar
• 34. Hojo K., Nagaoka S., Ohshima T., Maeda N.: Bacterial interactionsin dental biofilm development. J. Dent. Res., 2009; 88: 982-990
  Google Scholar
• 35. Huang R., Li M., Gregory R.L.: Bacterial interactions in dentalbiofilm. Virulence, 2011; 2: 435-444
  Google Scholar
• 36. Isselbacher K.J.: Irritable bowel syndrome: the possible benefitsof probiotics. Postgrad. Med., 2005; 117: 7
  Google Scholar
• 37. Jańczuk Z.: Stomatologia zachowawcza. Zarys kliniczny. PZWL,Warszawa 2007
  Google Scholar
• 38. Jones S.E., Versalovic J.: Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilmsproduce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiol.,2009; 9: 35
  Google Scholar
• 39. Kaci G., Goudercourt D., Dennin V., Pot B., Doré J., Ehrlich S.D.,Renault P., Blottiere H.M., Daniel C., Delorme C.: Anti-Inflammatoryproperties of Streptococcus salivarius, a commensal bacterium ofthe oral cavity and digestive tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2014;80: 928-934
  Google Scholar
• 40. Kankainen M., Paulin L., Tynkkynen S., von Ossowski I., ReunanenJ., Partanen P., Satokari R., Vesterlund S., Hendrickx A.P.,Lebeer S., De Keersmaecker S.C., Vanderleyden J., Hämäläinen T.,Laukkanen S., Salovuori N. i wsp.: Comparative genomic analysis ofLactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human-mucusbinding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2009; 106: 17193-17198
  Google Scholar
• 41. Kekkonen R.A., Lummela N., Karjalainen H., Latvala S., TynkkynenS., Jarvenpaa S., Kautiainen H., Julkunen I. Vapaatalo H., KorpelaR.: Probiotic intervention has strain-specific anti-inflammatory effectsin healthy adults. World J. Gastroenterol., 2008; 14: 2029-2036
  Google Scholar
• 42. Kleerebezem M., Boekhorst J., van Kranenburg R., Molenaar D.,Kuipers O.P., Leer R., Tarchini R., Peters S.A., Sandbrink H.M., FiersM.W., Stiekema W., Lankhorst R.M., Bron P.A., Hoffer S.M., GrootM.N. i wsp.: Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarumWCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003; 100: 1990-1995
  Google Scholar
• 43. Kolenbrander P.E., Andersen R.N., Blehert D.S., Egland P.G., FosterJ.S., Palmer R.J. Jr.: Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol.Mol. Biol. Rev., 2002; 66: 486-505
  Google Scholar
• 44. Kragen H.: The treatment of inflammatory affections of the oralmucosa with a lactic acid bacterial culture preparation. Zahnarztl.Welt., 1954; 9: 306-308
  Google Scholar
• 45. Krawczyk D.: Permanent tooth caries and the bacterial countin saliva and dental plaque. Dent. Med. Probl., 2009; 46: 202-207
  Google Scholar
• 46. Kutsch V.K., Young D.A.: New directions in the etiology of dentalcaries disease. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 2011; 39: 716-721
  Google Scholar
• 47. Laleman I., Detailleur V., Slot D.E., Slomka V., Quirynen M., TeughelsW.: Probiotics reduce mutans streptococci counts in humans:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Oral Investig., 2014;18: 1539-1552
  Google Scholar
• 48. Lee S.H., Kim Y.J.: A comparative study of the effect of probioticson cariogenic biofilm model for preventing dental caries. Arch.Microbiol., 2014; 196: 601-609
  Google Scholar
• 49. Lilly D.M., Stillwell R.H.: Probiotics: growth-promoting factorsproduced by microorganisms. Science, 1965; 147: 747-748
  Google Scholar
• 50. Lin M.Y., Chang F.J.: Antioxidative effect of intestinal bacteriaBifidobacterium longum ATCC 15708 and Lactobacillus acidophilusATCC 4356. Dig. Dis. Sci., 2000; 45: 1617-1622
  Google Scholar
• 51. Lipiński T., Jones C., Lemercinier X., Korzeniowska-Kowal A.,Strus M., Rybka J., Gamian A., Heczko P.B.: Structural analysis ofthe Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain KL37C exopolysaccharide. Carbohydr.Res., 2003; 338: 605-609
  Google Scholar
• 52. Ljungh A., Wadström T.: Lactic acid bacteria as probiotics. Curr.Issues Intest. Microbiol., 2006; 7: 73-89
  Google Scholar
• 53. Loesche W.J., Eklund S., Earnest R., Burt B.: Longitudinal investigationof bacteriology of human fissure decay: epidemiologicalstudies in molars shortly after eruption. Infect. Immun., 1984; 46:765-772
  Google Scholar
• 54. Makras L., Van Acker G., De Vuyst L.: Lactobacillus paracaseisubsp. paracasei 8700:2 degrades inulin-type fructans exhibitingdifferent degrees of polymerization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2005;71: 6531-6537
  Google Scholar
• 55. Mandell G., Bennett J., Dolin R.: Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’sPrinciples and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 7th Edition. ChurchillLivingstone Elsevier 2010
  Google Scholar
• 56. Manley K.J., Fraenkel M.B., Mayall B.C., Power D.A.: Probiotictreatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a randomised controlledtrial. Med. J. Aust., 2007; 186: 454-457
  Google Scholar
• 57. Marsh P.D.: Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significancein health and disease. Adv. Dent. Res., 1994; 8: 263-271
  Google Scholar
• 58. Meurman J.H.: Probiotics: do they have a role in oral medicineand dentistry? Eur. J. Oral Sci., 2005; 113: 188-196
  Google Scholar
• 59. Oh P.L., Benson A.K., Peterson D.A., Patil P.B., Moriyama E.N.,Roos S., Walter J.: Diversification of the gut symbiont Lactobacillusreuteri as a result of host-driven evolution. ISME J., 2010; 4: 377-387
  Google Scholar
• 60. Paineau D., Carcano D., Leyer G., Darquy S., Alyanakian M.A.,Simoneau G., Bergmann J.F., Brassart D., Bornet F., Ouwehand A.C.:Effects of seven potential probiotic strains on specific immune responsesin healthy adults: a double-blind, randomized, controlledtrial. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., 2008; 53: 107-113
  Google Scholar
• 61. Pasich E., Walczewska M., Pasich A., Marcinkiewicz J.: Mechanismand risk factors of oral biofilm formation. Postępy Hig. Med.Dośw., 2013; 67: 736-741
  Google Scholar
• 62. Polonskaya M.S.: Antibiotic from acidophilus. Microbiologiya1952; 21: 303-310
  Google Scholar
• 63. Rajkowska K., Kunicka-Styczyńska A., Rygała A.: Probiotic activityof Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii against human pathogens.Food Technol. Biotech., 2012; 50: 230-236
  Google Scholar
• 64. Rautava S., Kalliomäki M., Isolauri E.: Probiotics during pregnancyand breast-feeding might confer immunomodulatory protectionagainst atopic disease in the infant. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2002;109: 119-121
  Google Scholar
• 65. Riccia DN., Bizzini F., Perilli M.G., Polimeni A., Trinchieri V.,Amicosante G., Cifone MG.: Anti-inflammatory effects of Lactobacillusbrevis (CD2) on periodontal disease. Oral Dis., 2007; 13: 376-385
  Google Scholar
• 66. Ridwan B.U., Koning C.J., Besselink M.G., Timmerman H.M.,Brouwer E.C., Verhoef J., Gooszen H.G., Akkermans L.M.: Antimicrobialactivity of a multispecies probiotic (Ecologic 641) againstpathogens isolated from infected pancreatic necrosis. Lett. Appl.Microbiol., 2008; 46: 61-67
  Google Scholar
• 67. Schell M.A., Karmirantzou M., Snel B., Vilanova D., Berger B.,Pessi G., Zwahlen M.C., Desiere F., Bork P., Delley M., Pridmore R.D.,Arigoni F.: The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflectsits adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA, 2002; 99: 14422-14427
  Google Scholar
• 68. Shellis R.P., Dibdin G.H.: Analysis of the buffering systems indental plaque. J. Dent. Res., 1988; 67: 438-446
  Google Scholar
• 69. Shimauchi H., Mayanagi G., Nakaya S., Minamibuchi M., ItoY., Yamaki K., Hirata H.: Improvement of periodontal condition byprobiotics with Lactobacillus salivarius WB21: a randomized, double–blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2008; 35: 897-905
  Google Scholar
• 70. Sinkiewicz G., Ljunggren L.: Ocurrence of Lactobacillus reuteriin human breast milk. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis., 2008; 20: 122-126
  Google Scholar
• 71. Soccol C.R., Vandenberghe L.P., Spier M.R., Medeiros A.B., YamaguishiC.T., Lindner J.D., Pandey A., Thomaz-Soccol V.: The potentialof probiotics: a review. Food Technol. Biotechnol., 2010; 48: 413-434
  Google Scholar
• 72. Straetemans M.M., van Loveren C., de Soet J.J., de Graaff J., tenCate J.M.: Colonization with mutans streptococci and lactobacilliand the caries experience of children after the age of five. J. Dent.Res., 1998; 77: 1851-1855
  Google Scholar
• 73. Tanzer J.M., Kurasz A.B., Clive J.: Competitive displacement ofmutans streptococci and inhibition of tooth decay by Streptococcussalivarius TOVE-R. Infect. Immun., 1985; 48: 44-50
  Google Scholar
• 74. Tanzer J.M., Kurasz A.B., Clive J.: Inhibition of ecological emergenceof mutans streptococci naturally transmitted between ratsand consequent caries inhibition by Streptococcus salivarius TOVE-Rinfection. Infect. Immun., 1985; 49: 76-83
  Google Scholar
• 75. Teughels W., Loozen G., Quirynen M.: Do probiotics offer opportunitiesto manipulate the periodontal oral microbiota? J. Clin.Periodontol., 2011; 38: 159-177
  Google Scholar
• 76. Tsubura S., Mizunuma H., Ishikawa S., Oyake I., Okabayashi M.,Katoh K., Shibata M., Iizuka T., Toda T., Iizuka T.: The effect of Bacillussubtilis mouth rinsing in patients with periodontitis. Eur. J. Clin.Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 2009; 28: 1353-1356
  Google Scholar
• 77. Twetman S.: Treatment protocols: nonfluoride managementof the caries disease process and available diagnostics. Dent. Clin.North Am., 2010; 54: 527-540
  Google Scholar
• 78. Twetman S., Derawi B., Keller M., Ekstrand K., Yucel-LindbergT., Stecksen-Blicks C.: Short-term effect of chewing gums containingprobiotic Lactobacillus reuteri on the levels of inflammatory mediatorsin gingival crevicular fluid. Acta Odontol. Scand., 2009; 67: 19-24
  Google Scholar
• 79. Vadillo-Rodríguez V., Busscher H.J., van der Mei H.C., de VriesJ., Norde W.: Role of lactobacillus cell surface hydrophobicity as probedby AFM in adhesion to surfaces at low and high ionic strength.Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces., 2005; 41: 33-41
  Google Scholar
• 80. Walter J.: Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinaltract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Appl.Environ. Microbiol., 2008; 74: 4985-4996
  Google Scholar
• 81. Wescombe P.A., Hale J.D., Heng N.C., Tagg J.R.: Developing oralprobiotics from Streptococcus salivarius. Future Microbiol., 2012; 7:1355-1371
  Google Scholar
• 82. Wescombe P.A., Upton M., Renault P., Wirawan R.E., Power D.,Burton J.P., Chilcott C.N., Tagg J.R.: Salivaricin 9, a new lantibioticproduced by Streptococcus salivarius. Microbiology, 2011; 157: 1290-1299
  Google Scholar
• 83. Wilson M., Martin R., Walk S.T., Young C., Grossman S., McKeanE.L., Aronoff D.M.: Clinical and laboratory features of Streptococcussalivarius meningitis: a case report and literature review. Clin. Med.Res., 2012; 10: 15-25
  Google Scholar
• 84. Zisu B., Shah N.P.: Effects of pH, temperature, supplementationwith whey protein concentrate, and adjunct cultures on the productionof exopolysaccharides by Streptococcus thermophilus 1275. J.Dairy Sci., 2003; 86: 3405-3415
  Google Scholar

Full text