Genotypic methods for epidemiological typing of Staphylococcus aureus

REVIEW ARTICLE

Genotypic methods for epidemiological typing of Staphylococcus aureus

Martyna Kasela 1 , Anna Malm 1 , Bożena Nowakowicz-Dębek 2 , Mateusz Ossowski 3

1. Katedra i Zakład Mikrobiologii Farmaceutycznej z Pracownią Diagnostyki Mikrobiologicznej Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lublinie,
2. Katedra Higieny Zwierząt i Zagrożeń Środowiska, Zakład Zagrożeń Zawodowych i Środowiskowych Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Lublinie,
3. Katedra Higieny Zwierząt i Zagrożeń Środowiska Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego w Lublinie,

Published: 2019-05-15
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.2020
GICID: 01.3001.0013.2020
Available language versions: en pl
Issue: Postepy Hig Med Dosw 2019; 73 : 245-255

 

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is an important pathogen causing both hospital and community-acquired infections. S. aureus strains are often resistant to commonly used antibiotics, thus development of techniques to rapidly identify and genotype is essential in order to control the dissemination of multidrug resistant strains of S. aureus in the environment, which could lead to an epidemic. Typing methods can be divided into those based on phenotypic and those based on genetic characteristics of the examined microorganism. The most reliable genotypic methods in S. aureus epidemiological studies were described. These would include the following: Plasmid Profile Analysis (PPA), Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST), Spa Typing, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Amplified-Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP), Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), Multiple-Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS). All of these methods have been compared in terms of their reproducibility, costs, time of analysis, differentiation potential and exemplary applications in epidemiological studies of S. aureus. Despite there being a variety of methods currently used for genotyping, not all of them meet the criteria set by different kinds of epidemiological investigations. Because of the large amount of generated data and decrease of costs, the most popular methods used for S. aureus genotyping are based on sequencing techniques.

References

  • 1. Alfizah H., Norazah A., Nordiah A.J., Lim V.K.: DNA fingerprintingof methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by pulsed-fieldgel electrophoresis (PFGE) in a teaching hospital in Malaysia. Med. J.Malaysia, 2002; 57: 319-328
    Google Scholar
  • 2. Bruisten S.M., Schouls L.: Molecular typing and clustering analysisas a tool for epidemiology of infectious diseases. W: Modern infectiousdisease epidemiology, red.: A. Kramer, M. Kretzschmar, K. Krickeberg,Springer, New York 2009, 117-141
    Google Scholar
  • 3. Cheung A.L., Bayer A.S., Peter J., Ward J.I.: Surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Rev. Infect. Dis., 1988; 10: S351-S355
    Google Scholar
  • 4. Cookson B.D., Robinson D.A., Monk A.B., Murchan S., Deplano A., deRyck R., Struelens M.J., Scheel C., Fussing V., Salmenlinna S., VuopioVarkila J., Cuny C., Witte W., Tassios P.T., Legakis N.J. i wsp.: Evaluationof molecular typing methods in characterizing a European collectionof epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains: theHARMONY collection. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2007; 45: 1830-1837
    Google Scholar
  • 5. Deurenberg R.H., Bathoorn E., Chlebowicz M.A., Couto N., FerdousM., García-Cobos S., Kooistra-Smid A.M., Raangs E.C., Rosema S., VelooA.C., Zhou K., Friedrich A.W., Rossen J.W.: Application of next generation sequencing in clinical microbiology and infection prevention. J.Biotech., 2017; 243: 16-24
    Google Scholar
  • 6. Devriese L.A.: A simplified system for biotyping Staphylococcusaureus strains isolated from animal species. J. Appl. Microbiol., 1984;56: 215-220
    Google Scholar
  • 7. Doškař J., Pantůček R., Růžičková V., Sedláček I.: Molecular diagnostics of Staphylococcus aureus. W: Detection od bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi. Bioterrorism prevention, red. M.V. Magni,Springer, Dordrecht 2010, 139-184
    Google Scholar
  • 8. Dukic V.M., Lauderdale D.S., Wilder J., Daum R.S., David M.Z.:Epidemics of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States: a meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2013;8: e52722
    Google Scholar
  • 9. Easy Genotyping PCR-RFLP – genotyping of Staphylococcus aureusstrains by PCR-RFLP. http://www.dnagdansk.com/media/Products/edukit_easygenotyping_RFLP_instructor_web_1.pdf (12.06.2018)
    Google Scholar
  • 10. Elbir H., Robert C., Nguyen T.T., Gimenez G., El Sanousi S.M. FlockJ.I., Raoult D., Drancourt M.: Staphylococcus aureus subsp. anaerobiusstrain ST1464 genome sequence. Stand. Genomic Sci., 2013; 9: 1-13
    Google Scholar
  • 11. Faria N.A., Carrico J.A., Oliveira D.C., Ramirez M., de LencastreH.: Analysis of typing methods for epidemiological surveillance ofboth methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcusaureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2008; 46: 136-144
    Google Scholar
  • 12. Gordon N.C., Price J.R., Cole K., Everitt R., Morgan M., Finney J., Kearns A.M., Pichon B., Young B., Wilson D.J., Llewelyn M.J., Paul J., PetoT.E., Crook D.W., Walker A.S. i wsp.: Prediction of Staphylococcus aureusantimicrobial resistance by whole-genome sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2014; 52: 1182-1191
    Google Scholar
  • 13. Hookey J.V., Richardson J.F., Cookson B.D.: Molecular typing ofStaphylococcus aureus based on PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism and DNA sequence analysis of the coagulase gene. J. Clin.Microbiol., 1998; 36: 1083-1089
    Google Scholar
  • 14. Hunter P.R.: Reproducibility and indices of discriminatory powerof microbial typing methods. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1990; 28: 1903-1905
    Google Scholar
  • 15. Jiang X., Liu Y., Liu Q., Jing W., Qin K., Sui G.: Rapid capture and analysis of airborne Staphylococcus aureus in the hospital using a microfluidicchip. Micromachines, 2016; 7: 169
    Google Scholar
  • 16. Kasela M., Malm A.: Overview of phenotypic methods used fordifferentiation of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr. Issues Pharm. Med. Sci.,2018; 31: 117-121
    Google Scholar
  • 17. Kim C., Mwangi M., Chung M., Milheirço C., de Lencastre H., TomaszA.: The mechanism of heterogeneous beta-lactam resistance in MRSA:key role of the stringent stress response. PLoS One, 2013; 8: e82814
    Google Scholar
  • 18. Kondak K.: Molekularne metody diagnostyki mikrobiologicznej.Diagn. Lab., 2009; 45: 325-331
    Google Scholar
  • 19. Krawczyk B.: Diagnostyka molekularna w zakażeniach szpitalnych.Post. Mikrobiol., 2007; 46: 367-378
    Google Scholar
  • 20. Kwong J.C., McCallum N., Sintchenko V., Howden B.P.: Whole genome sequencing in clinical and public health microbiology. Pathology, 2015; 47: 199-210
    Google Scholar
  • 21. Lee B.Y., Singh A., David M.Z., Bartsch S.M., Slayton R.B., HuangS.S., Zimmer S.M., Potter M.A., Macal C.M., Lauderdale D.S., Miller L.G.,Daum R.S.: The economic burden of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Clin. Microbiol. Infect.,2013; 19: 528-536
    Google Scholar
  • 22. Łuczak-Kadłubowska A., Sulikowska A., Empel J., Piasecka A., Orczykowska M., Kozinska A., Hryniewicz W.: Countrywide molecularsurvey of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Poland.J. Clin. Microbiol., 2008; 46: 2930-2937
    Google Scholar
  • 23. Maiden M.C., Jansen Van Rensburg M.J., Bray J.E., Earle S.G., FordS.A., Jolley K.A., McCarthy N.D.: MLST revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2013; 11: 728-736
    Google Scholar
  • 24. Manukumar H.M., Umesha S.: MALDI-TOF-MS based identificationand molecular characterization of food associated methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep., 2017; 7: 1414
    Google Scholar
  • 25. Marlowe E.M., Bankowski M.J.: Conventional and molecular methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J.Clin. Microbiol., 2011; 49: S53-S56
    Google Scholar
  • 26. Mobasherizadeh S., Shojaei H., Havaei S.A., Mostafavizadeh K.,Davoodabadi F., Khorvash F., Ataei B., Daei-Naser A.: Application of therandom amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting to analyze genetic variation in community associated-methicillin resistantStaphylococcus Aureus (CA-MRSA) isolates in Iran. Glob. J. Health Sci.,2016; 8: 185-191
    Google Scholar
  • 27. Ohadian Moghadam S., Pourmand M.R., Douraghi M., Sabzi S., Ghaffari P.: Utilization of PFGE as a powerful discriminative tool for theinvestigation of genetic diversity among MRSA strains. Iran. J. PublicHealth, 2017; 46: 351-356
    Google Scholar
  • 28. Okuma K., Iwakawa K., Turnidge J.D., Grubb W.B., Bell J.M., O’BrienF.G., Coombs G.W., Pearman J.W., Tenover F.C., Kapi M., Tiensasitorn C.,Ito T., Hiramatsu K.: Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2002; 40:4289-4294
    Google Scholar
  • 29. Onasanya A., Mignouna H.D., Thottappilly, G.: Genetic fingerprinting and phylogenetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolatesfrom Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2003; 2: 246-250
    Google Scholar
  • 30. Pobiega M., Wójkowska-Mach J., Heczko P.B.: Typowanie Staphylococcus aureus w celu określenia dróg szerzenia się lekoopornych szczepów w środowisku szpitalnym i pozaszpitalnym. Przegl. Epidemiol.,2013; 67: 539-542
    Google Scholar
  • 31. Pourcel C., Hormigos K., Onteniente L., Sakwinska O., DeurenbergR.H., Vergnaud G.: Improved MLVA assay for Staphylococcus aureus providing a highly informative genotyping technique together with strongphylogenetic value. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2009; 47: 3121-3128
    Google Scholar
  • 32. Price J., Gordon N.C., Crook D., Llewelyn M., Paul J.: The usefulnessof whole genome sequencing in the management of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 2013; 19: 784-789
    Google Scholar
  • 33. Price J.R., Didelot X., Crook D.W., Llewelyn M.J., Paul J.: Whole genome sequencing in the prevention and control of Staphylococcus aureusinfection. J. Hosp. Infect., 2013; 83: 14-21
    Google Scholar
  • 34. Rabello R.F., Moreira B.M., Lopes R.M., Teixeira L.M., Riley L.W.,Castro A.C.: Multilocus sequence typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from cows with mastitis in Brazilian dairy herds. J. Med.Microbiol., 2007; 56: 1505-1511
    Google Scholar
  • 35. Rasschaert G., Vanderhaeghen W., Dewaele I., Janež N., HuijsdensX., Butaye P., Heyndrickx M.: Comparison of fingerprinting methods fortyping methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398. J.Clin. Microbiol., 2009; 47: 3313-3322
    Google Scholar
  • 36. Rodriguez M., Hogan P.G., Satola S.W., Crispell E., Wylie T., Gao H.,Sodergren E., Weinstock G.M., Burnham C.A., Fritz S.A.: Discriminatoryindices of typing methods for epidemiologic analysis of contemporarystaphylococcus aureus strains. Medicine, 2015; 94: 1534
    Google Scholar
  • 37. Rolo J., Miragaia M., Turlej-Rogacka A., Empel J., Bouchami O., FariaN.A., Tavares A., Hryniewicz W., Fluit A.C., de Lencastre H., CONCORDWorking Group: High genetic diversity among community-associatedStaphylococcus aureus in Europe: results from a multicenter study. PLoSOne, 2012; 7: e34768
    Google Scholar
  • 38. Sabat A., Krzyszton-Russjan J., Strzalka W., Filipek R., Kosowska K.,Hryniewicz W., Travis J., Potempa J.: New method for typing Staphylococcus aureus strains: multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeatanalysis of polymorphism and genetic relationships of clinical isolates.J. Clin. Microbiol., 2003; 41: 1801-1804
    Google Scholar
  • 39. Sabat A., Malachowa N., Miedzobrodzki J., Hryniewicz W.: Comparison of PCR-based methods for typing Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J.Clin. Microbiol., 2006; 44: 3804-3807
    Google Scholar
  • 40. Saruta K., Hoshina S., Machida K.: Genetic identification of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction using single-base-pairmismatch in 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Microbiol. Immunol., 1995; 39:839-844
    Google Scholar
  • 41. Savelkoul P.H., Aarts H.J., De Haas J., Dijkshoorn L., Duim B., OtsenM., Rademaker J.L., Schouls L., Lenstra J.A.: Amplified-fragment lengthpolymorphism analysis: the state of an art. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1999;37: 3083-3091
    Google Scholar
  • 42. Shahkarami F., Rashki A., Rashki Ghalehnoo Z.R.: Microbial susceptibility and plasmid profiles of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. Jundishapur J. Microbiol.,2014; 7: e16984
    Google Scholar
  • 43. Shakeri F., Mansourian A.R., Ghaeim E.A.: Staphylococcus aureus protein A gene typing by PCR-RFLP. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 2013; 7: 3448-3452
    Google Scholar
  • 44. Sobral D., Schwarz S., Bergonier D., Brisabois A., Feßler A.T., GilbertF.B., Kadlec K., Lebeau B., Loisy-Hamon F., Treilles M., Pourcel C., Vergnaud G.: High throughput multiple locus variable number of tandemrepeat analysis (MLVA) of Staphylococcus aureus from human, animaland food sources. PLoS One, 2012; 7: e33967
    Google Scholar
  • 45. Sridhar R.: Typing methods. http://microrao.com/micronotes/typing.pdf (12.06.2018)
    Google Scholar
  • 46. Stark L.: Staphylococcus aureus: aspects of pathogenesis and molecular epidemiology. PhD Thesis, Linköping University ElectronicPress, Linköping 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 47. Stojowska K.: Opracowanie nowych metod typowania genetycznego bakterii opartych o ligację adaptorów oligonukleotydowychdo fragmentów restrykcyjnych genomowego DNA i technikę PCR,zastosowanie i ocena ich przydatności w badaniach epidemiologicznych. http://pbc.gda.pl/Content/24012 (12.06.2018)
    Google Scholar
  • 48. Strauß L., Ruffing U., Abdulla S., Alabi A., Akulenko R., GarrineM., Germann A., Grobusch M.P., Helms V., Herrmann M., Kazimoto T,,Kern W., Mandomando I., Peters G., Schaumburg F. i wsp.: DetectingStaphylococcus aureus virulence and resistance genes: a comparisonof whole-genome sequencing and DNA microarray technology. J.Clin. Microbiol., 2016; 54: 1008-1016
    Google Scholar
  • 49. Szabó J.: Molecular methods in epidemiology of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): advantages, disadvantages ofdifferent techniques. J. Med. Microb. Diagn., 2014; 3: 1000147
    Google Scholar
  • 50. Szaluś-Jordanow O., Chrobak D., Pyrgiel M., Lutyńska A., KabaJ., Czopowicz M., Witkowski L., Kizerwetter-Świda M., Binek M., Frymus T.: PFGE and AFLP genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus subsp.anaerobius isolated from goats with Morel’s disease. Arch. Microbiol., 2013; 195: 37-41
    Google Scholar
  • 51. Ugbogu O.C., Akinsade A.K., Nwokocha K.O., Ahuama O.C.: Plasmid profile of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolatesfrom university students. Nig. J. Microbiol., 2011; 25: 2363-2368
    Google Scholar
  • 52. Vainio A.: Molecular methods for the epidemiological analysis ofmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Streptococcus pneumoniae. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL),Tampere, Finland 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 53. Van Belkum A.: Hidden Staphylococcus aureus carriage: overratedor underappreciated? MBio, 2016; 7: e00079-16
    Google Scholar
  • 54. Van Leeuwen W.B., Jay C., Snijders S., Durin N., Lacroix B., Verbrugh H.A., Enright M.C., Troesch A., van Belkum A.: Multilocus sequence typing of Staphylococcus aureus with DNA array technology.J. Clin. Microbiol., 2003; 41: 3323-3326
    Google Scholar
  • 55. Witt R.T., van Belkum A., van Leeuwen W.B.: Molecular diagnostics and genotyping of MRSA: an update. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn.,2010; 10: 375-380
    Google Scholar

Full text

Skip to content