ARTYKUŁ PRZEGLĄDOWY
Porównanie metod optycznych oznaczania liczby bakterii
Bożena Szermer-Olearnik 1 , Marta Sochocka 2 , Katarzyna Zwolińska 3 , Jarosław Ciekot 1 , Anna Czarny 4 , Joanna Szydzik 1 , Konrad Kowalski 1 , Janusz Boratyński 51. Laboratory of Biomedical Chemistry “Neolek”, Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
2. Laboratory of Biomedical Chemistry “Neolek”, Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland; Laboratory of Virology, Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
3. Laboratory of Virology, Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
4. Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
5. Laboratory of Biomedical Chemistry “Neolek”, Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland; Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Poland
Opublikowany: 2014-01-02
DOI: 10.5604/17322693.1130086
GICID: 01.3001.0003.1379
Dostępne wersje językowe: pl en
Wydanie: Postepy Hig Med Dosw 2014; 68 : 1392-1396
Abstrakt
Przypisy
- 1. Asencios L., Galarza M., Quispe N., Vásquez L., Leo E., ValenciaE., Ramírez J., Acurio M., Salazar R., Mendoza-Ticona A., Cáceres O.:Molecular test Genotype® MTBDR plus, an alternative to rapid detectionof multidrug resistance tuberculosis. Rev. Peru. Med. Exp.Salud Publica, 2012; 29: 92-98
Google Scholar - 2. Biesta-Peters E.G., Reij M.W., Joosten H., Gorris L.G., ZwieteringM.H.: Comparison of two optical-density-based methods and a platecount method for estimation of growth parameters of Bacillus cereus.Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2010; 76: 1399-1405
Google Scholar - 3. Brandao M.M., Rosas C.O.. Bricio S.M., Medeiros V.M., Costa J.C.,Pinheiro R.R., Cardarelli-Leite P., Cruz M.H., Nobrega A.W.: Preparationof reference material for proficiency test for enumeration ofcoliforms in cheese matrix. Detection, 2013; 1: 7-12
Google Scholar - 4. Brown K.J.: A method for turbidimetric measurement of bacterialgrowth in liquid cultures and agar plug diffusion cultures, usingstandard test tubes. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1980; 9: 59-62
Google Scholar - 5. Chapin K.C., Lauderdale T., Baron E. J., Jorgensen J.H., Landry M.L.,Pfaller M.A.: Reagents, stains, and media: bacteriology, In: Manual ofClinical Microbiology, 9th ed. Washington, 2007: 334-364
Google Scholar - 6. Chomczynski P., Qasba P.K.: Alkaline transfer of DNA to plastikmembrane. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1984: 122: 340-344
Google Scholar - 7. Gallagher S.R.: Quantitation of DNA and RNA with absorptionand fluorescence spectroscopy. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., 2011; Appendix3: 3D
Google Scholar - 8. Hernández A., Marín M.: New turbidimetric method for estimatingbacterial growth in heterogeneous media. Process Biochemistry,2002; 37: 1125-1128
Google Scholar - 9. Hoefel D., Grooby W.L., Monis P.T., Andrews S., Saint C.P:. Enumerationof water-borne bacteria using viability assays and flowcytometry: a comparison to culture-based techniques. J. Microbiol.Methods, 2003; 55: 585-597
Google Scholar - 10. Hunter D.M., Lim D.V.: Rapid detection and identification ofbacterial pathogens by using an ATP bioluminescence immunoassay.J. Food Prot., 2010; 73: 739-746
Google Scholar - 11. Junick J., Blaut M.: Quantification of human fecal Bifidobacteriumspecies by quantitative real-time PCR targeting the groEL gene.Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2012; 78: 2613-2622
Google Scholar - 12. Ketchum P.A.: Microbiology: concepts and applications. JohnWiley & Sons, Inc, USA, 1988
Google Scholar - 13. Khan M.M., Pyle B.H., Camper A.K.: Specific and rapid enumerationof viable but nonculturable and viable-culturable gram-negativebacteria by using flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2010;76: 5088-5096
Google Scholar - 14. Kuiken K.A., Lyman C.M., Hale F.: Factors which influence thestability of tryptophan during the hydrolisys of proteins in alkalinesolution. J. Biol. Chem., 1947; 171; 551-560
Google Scholar - 15. Li R.C., Nix D.E., Schentag J.J.: New turbidimetric assay for quantitationof viable bacterial densities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1993; 37: 371-374
Google Scholar - 16. Mandal T.K., Parvin N.: Rapid detection of bacteria by carbonquantum dots. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol., 2011; 7: 846-848
Google Scholar - 17. Mechsner K.L.: An automated nephelometric system for evaluationof the growth of bacterial cultures. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1984;163: 85-90
Google Scholar - 18. Menozzi A., Ossiprandi M.C.: Assessment of enteral bacteria.Curr. Protoc. Toxicol., 2010; Chapter 21: Unit 21.3
Google Scholar - 19. Nakouti I., Sihanonth P., Hobbs G.: A new approach to isolatingsiderophore-producing actinobacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.,2012; 55: 68-72
Google Scholar - 20. Navidshad B., Liang J.B., Jahromi M.F.: Correlation coefficientsbetween different methods of expressing bacterial quantificationusing real time PCR. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2012; 13: 2119-2132
Google Scholar - 21. Olsson C., Kapoor D., Howard G.: A method for the rapid detectionof urinary tract infections. Urology, 2012; 79: 761-765
Google Scholar - 22. Pathak S., Awuh J.A., Leversen N.A., Flo T.H., Asjø B.: Countingmycobacteria in infected human cells and mouse tissue: a comparisonbetween qPCR and CFU. PLoS One, 2012; 7: e34931
Google Scholar - 23. Pernthaler A., Pernthaler J.: Fluorescence in situ hybridizationfor the identification of environmental microbes. Methods Mol.Biol., 2007; 353: 153-164
Google Scholar - 24. Sanders E.R.: Aseptic laboratory techniques: plating methods.J. Vis. Exp., 2012; 63: e3064
Google Scholar - 25. Simonian M.H., Smith J.A.: Spectrophotometric and colorimetricdetermination of protein concentration. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol.,2006; Chapter 10: Unit 10.1A
Google Scholar - 26. Sule P., Wadhawan T., Carr N.J., Horne S.M., Wolfe A.J., Prüs B.M.:A combination of assays reveals biomass differences in biofilms formedby Escherichia coli mutants. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 2009; 49: 299-304
Google Scholar