ARTYKUŁ PRZEGLĄDOWY
Wpływ podłoży do hodowli limfocytów na liczbę metafaz oraz rozdzielczość prążkową chromosomów
Piotr Chomik 1 , Magdalena Gryzinska 2 , Justyna Batkowska 2 , Grazyna Jezewska-Witkowska 2 , Janusz Kocki 11. Chair of Medical Genetics Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin
2. Department of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin
Opublikowany: 2016-10-10
DOI: 10.5604/17322693.1221785
GICID: 01.3001.0009.6887
Dostępne wersje językowe: pl en
Wydanie: Postepy Hig Med Dosw 2016; 70 : 1095-1100
Abstrakt
Przypisy
- 1. Andraszek K., Gryzińska M., Knaga S., Wójcik E., Smalec E.: Numberand size of nucleoli in the spermatocytes of chicken and Japanesequail. Folia Biol., 2012; 60: 121-127
Google Scholar - 2. Andraszek K., Smalec E.: Comparison of active transcription regionsof lampbrush chromosomes with the mitotic chromosomeG pattern in the European domestic goose Anser anser. Arch. Tierzucht,2011; 54: 69-82
Google Scholar - 3. Andraszek K., Smalec E., Wrzaszcz L.: Description of G bands onthe chromosomes of the European domestic goose (Anser anser).Arch. Geflugelk., 2007; 71: 272-277
Google Scholar - 4. Burt D.W.: Origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes.Cytogenet. Genome Res., 2002; 96: 97-112
Google Scholar - 5. Deng W., Tsao S.W., Lucas J.N., Leung C.S., Cheung A.L.: A newmethod for improving metaphase chromosome spreading. Cytometry,2003; 51A: 46-51
Google Scholar - 6. Holmquist G.P.: Chromosome bands, their chromatin flavors,and their functional features. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 1992; 51: 17-37
Google Scholar - 7. IBM Corp. Released. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp 2003
Google Scholar - 8. Lim A.S., Chia P., Kee S.K., Raman S., Tien S.L.: The importanceof high resolution chromosome analysis in the diagnosis of birthdefects: case reports of holoproscencephaly and cystic hygroma.Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore, 2004; 33: 537-540
Google Scholar - 9. Marko J.F.: Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.Chromosome Res., 2008; 16: 469-497
Google Scholar - 10. Moore C.M., Best R.G.: Chromosome preparation and banding.Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Nature Publishing Group, John Wiley& Sons, Ltd 2001
Google Scholar - 11. Qu Y.Y., Xing L.Y., Hughes E.D., Saunders T.L.: Chromosome droppertool: effect of slide angles on chromosome spread quality formurine embryonic stem cells. J. Histotechnol., 2008; 3: 75-79
Google Scholar - 12. Rooney D.E.: Human cytogenetics: constitutional analysis apractical approach. Oxford University Press, 2001; 33-36
Google Scholar - 13. Smith K.: Diagnostic cytogenetics. Chromosome Res., 2000; 8:275-276
Google Scholar - 14. Spurbeck J.L., Zinsmeister A.R., Meyer K.J., Jalal S.M.: Dynamicsof chromosome spreading. Am. J. Med. Genet., 1996; 61: 387-393
Google Scholar - 15. Szczałuba K., Obersztyn E., Mazurczak T.: Application of novelmolecular cytogenetics techniques in the diagnostics of congenitalbirth defects. Perinatol. Neonatol. Ginekol., 2010; 3: 106-108
Google Scholar - 16. Wojcik E., Andraszek K., Gryzinska M.,Witkowski A., PalyszkaM., Smalec E.: Sister chromatid exchange in Greenleg Partridge andPolbar hens covered by the gene-pool protection program for farmanimals in Poland. Poult. Sci., 2012; 91: 2424-2430
Google Scholar - 17. Wójcik E., Smalec E.: Comparing the karyotype of the Europeandomestic goose and the Asian goose on the basis of the karyotype oftheir interspecific cross-breed, using the RBG chromosome stainingtechnique. Folia Biol., 2011; 59: 107-113
Google Scholar