Abstrakt

Aim of the study was to assess the risk of any allergic reaction or food hypersensitivity resulting from topical application and chronic oral administration of the fruit of selected strawberry cultivars (‘Elsanta’ and ‘Honeoye’) from farms managed organically. Materials and methods. The plantations were managed according to organic (OFP) as compared to integrated production (IFP) systems. The experiments were performed on outbred young, adult, white albinotic guinea pigs (Dunkin Hartley). Fruit characteristics included total soluble solid content, titratable acidity, sugar, polyphenol content and macro- and micronutrients. Results. The most pronounced changes in guinea pig skin followed topical exposure to ‘Elsanta’ strawberries from plantations managed organically showed discrete, moderate or intense erythema and swelling. Chronic oral administration of selected fruit extracts did not cause any skin reactions in groups receiving ‘Elsanta’ or ‘Honeoye’ from organic or integrated productions. The skin prick test did not show any immediate skin reactions compared to exposure to 1% histamine hydrochloride solution. Conclusion. Organic method of strawberry production cannot be concerned as more allergenic one as compared to integrated system. Any strict relationship between type of cultivar and selected macro-, micronutrients contents or fruit characteristics on the possible increase in allergenicity risk, was not found, either.

Przypisy

• 1. Bolhaar S.T., van de Weg W.E., van Ree R., Gonzalez-Mancebo E.,Zuidmeer L., Bruijnzeel-Koomen C.A., Fernandez-Rivas M., JansenJ., Hoffmann-Sommergruber K., Knulst A.C., Gilissen L.J.: In vivoassessment with prick-to-prick testing and double-blind, placebo–controlled food challenge of allergenicity of apple cultivars. J. AllergyClin. Immunol., 2005; 116: 1080-1086
  Google Scholar
• 2. Candir E., Kamiloglu M., Üstün D., Kendir G.T.: Comparison postharvestquality of conventionally and organically grown ‘WashingtonNavel’ oranges. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual., 2013; 86: 59-65
  Google Scholar
• 3. Crespo J.F., Rodríguez J., James J.M., Daroca P., Reaño M., Vives R.:Reactivity to potential cross-reactive foods in fruit-allergic patients:Implications for prescribing food avoidance. Allergy, 2002; 57: 946-949
  Google Scholar
• 4. Cross J.V., Dickler E.: Guidelines for integrated production ofpome fruits in Europe: IOBC Technical Guideline III. IOBC wprs Bulletin,1994; 17: 1-8
  Google Scholar
• 5. Dreborg S., Backman A., Basomba A., Bousquet J., Dieges P., MallingH.J.: Skin tests used in type I allergy testing. Position paperprepared by the subcommittee on skin tests of the European Academyof Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy, 1989; 44: 11-59
  Google Scholar
• 6. Focke M., Hemmer W., Wöhrl S., Götz M., Jarisch R.: Cross-reactivitybetween Ficus benjamina latex and fig fruit in patients withclinical fig allergy. Clin. Exp. Allergy, 2003; 33: 971-977
  Google Scholar
• 7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org/ (01.02.2018)
  Google Scholar
• 8. Hsieh L.S., Moos M. Jr., Lin Y.: Characterization of apple 18 and 31kd allergens by microsequencing and evaluation of their content duringstorage and ripening. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 1995; 96: 960-970
  Google Scholar
• 9. Jasińska-Stroschein M., Szcześniak P., Owczarek J., Rutkowski K.P.,Markowski J., Rozpara E., Orszulak-Michalak D.: The assessment ofthe risk of allergenicity of ‘Sabina’ and ‘Debreceni Bötermö’ sourcherry cvs (Prunus cerasus L.) in a Guinea pig model. J. Hort. Res.,2014; 22: 63-70
  Google Scholar
• 10. Jorge A., Soares E., Sarinho E., Lorente F., Gama J., Taborda-BarataL.: Prevalence and clinical features of adverse food reactionsin Portuguese children. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol., 2017: 13: 40
  Google Scholar
• 11. Karlsson A.L., Alm R., Ekstrand B., Fjelkner-Modig S., Schiött A.,Bengtsson U., Björk L., Hjernø K., Roepstorff P., Emanuelsson C.S.:Bet v 1 homologues in strawberry identified as IgE-binding proteinsand presumptive allergens. Allergy, 2004; 59: 1277-1284
  Google Scholar
• 12. Kelly S.D., Bateman A.S.: Comparison of mineral concentrationsin commercially grown organic and conventional crops – Tomatoes(Lycopersicon esculentum) and lettuces (Lactuca sativa). Food Chem.,2010; 119: 738-745
  Google Scholar
• 13. Khalil H.A., Hassan S.M.: Ascorbic acid, β-carotene, total phenoliccompound and microbiological quality of organic and conventional citrusand strawberry grown in Egypt. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2015; 14: 272-277
  Google Scholar
• 14. Krebitz M., Wagner B., Ferreira F., Peterbauer C., Campillo N.,Witty M., Kolarich D., Steinkellner H., Scheiner O., Breiteneder H.:Plant-based heterologous expression of Mal d 2, a thaumatin-likeprotein and allergen of apple (Malus domestica), and its characterizationas an antifungal protein. J. Mol. Biol., 2003; 329: 721-730
  Google Scholar
• 15. Kurze E., Kock V., Lo Scalzo R., Olbricht K., Schwab W.: Effect ofthe strawberry genotype, cultivation and processing on the Fra a 1allergen content. Nutrients, 2018: 10: 857
  Google Scholar
• 16. Lind K., Lafer G., Schloffer K., Innerhofer G., Meister H.: OrganicFruit Growing. CABI Publishing, Wallingford 2003
  Google Scholar
• 17. Magnusson B., Kligman A.M.: The identification of contact allergensby animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J. Invest.Dermatol., 1969; 52: 268-276
  Google Scholar
• 18. OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Skin Sensitization.Adopted by the Council on 17th July 1992. http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/SuppDocs/FedDocs/OECD/OECDtg406.pdf (01.08.2016)
  Google Scholar
• 19. Reganold J.P., Andrews P.K., Reeve J.R., Carpenter-Boggs L.,Schadt C.W., Alldredge J.R., Ross C.F., Davies N.M., Zhou J.: Fruit andsoil quality of organic and conventional strawberry agroecosystems.PLoS One, 2010; 5: e12346
  Google Scholar
• 20. Ryan M.H., Derrick J.W., Dann P.R.: Grain mineral concentrationsand yield of wheat grown under organic and conventional management.J. Sci. Food Agric., 2004; 84: 207-216
  Google Scholar
• 21. Tõnutare T., Moor U., Mölder K., Põldma P.: Fruit compositionof organically and conventionally cultivated strawberry ‘Polka’.Agron. Res., 2009; 7: 755-760
  Google Scholar
• 22. Vanek-Krebitz M., Hoffmann-Sommergruber K., Laimer da CamaraMachado M., Susani M., Ebner C., Kraft D., Scheiner O., BreitenederH.: Cloning and sequencing of Mal d 1, the major allergenfrom apple (Malus domestica), and its immunological relationshipto Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen. Biochem. Biophys. Res.Commun., 1995; 214: 538-551
  Google Scholar
• 23. Winter C.K., Davis S.F.: Organic foods. J. Food Sci., 2006; 71: 117-124
  Google Scholar
• 24. Woese K., Lange D., Boess C., Bögl K.W.: A comparison of organicallyand conventionally grown foods – results of a review of therelevant literature. J. Sci. Food Agric., 1997; 74: 281-293
  Google Scholar
• 25. Zuidmeer L., Salentijn E., Rivas M.F., Mancebo E.G., Asero R.,Matos C.I., Pelgrom K.T., Gilissen L.J., van Ree R.: The role of profilinand lipid transfer protein in strawberry allergy in the Mediterraneanarea. Clin. Exp. Allergy, 2006; 36: 666-675
  Google Scholar

Pełna treść artykułu