Abstrakt

Przypisy

• 1. Barczynska R.: Resistant dextrin prepared from potato starch assubstances with prebiotic properties. Ph.D. thesis. Technical Universityof Lodz, 2010
  Google Scholar
• 2. Barczynska R., Jochym K., Slizewska K., Kapusniak J., LibudziszZ.: The effect of citric acid-modified enzyme-resistant dextrin ongrowth and metabolism of selected strains of probiotic and otherintestinal bacteria. J. Funct. Foods, 2010; 2: 126-133
  Google Scholar
• 3. Bielecka M., Biedrzycka E., Majkowska A., Juśkiewicz J., WróblewskaM.: Effect of non-digestible oligosaccharides on gut microecosystemin rats. Food Res. Int., 2002; 35: 139-144
  Google Scholar
• 4. Blaut M., Clavel T.: Metabolic diversity of the intestinal microbiota:implications for health and disease. J. Nutr., 2007; 137 (Suppl.2): 751S-755S
  Google Scholar
• 5. Brown I.L.: Applications and uses of resistant starch. J. AOAC Int.,2004; 87: 727-732
  Google Scholar
• 6. Codex Alimentarius Commission: Report of the 30th session ofthe Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special DietaryUses. ALINORM 09/32/26, Appendix II (p. 46). Cape Town, SouthAfrica, 2008
  Google Scholar
• 7. Crittenden R.G., Morris L.F., Harvey M.L., Tran L.T., Mitchell H.L,Playne M.J.: Selection of a Bifidobacterium strain to complement resistantstarch in a synbiotic yoghurt. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2001; 90:268-278
  Google Scholar
• 8. Darukaradhya J., Phillips M., Kailasapathy K.: Selective enumerationof Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium spp., starter lactic acidbacteria and non-starter lactic acid bacteria from Cheddar cheese.Int. Dairy J., 2006; 16: 439-445
  Google Scholar
• 9. Eerlingen R.C., Delcour J.A.: Formation, analysis, structure andproperties of type III enzyme resistant starch. J. Cereal Sci., 1995;22: 129-138
  Google Scholar
• 10. Englyst H.N., Kingman S.M., Cummings J.H.: Classification andmeasurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur. J. Clin.Nutr., 1992; 46 (Suppl. 2): S33-S50
  Google Scholar
• 11. FAO Technical Meeting on Prebiotics. Food Quality and StanReferencesdards Service (AGNS), Food and Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations (FAO). FAO Technical meeting Report 2007
  Google Scholar
• 12. Fitzpatrick L.R., Small J.S., Bostwick E.F., Hoerr R.A.: The novelprobiotic Escherichia coli strain M-17 uniquely inhibits pro- inflammatorycytokine secretion in macrophage and colonic epithelial celllines. Gastroenterology, 2010; 138 (Suppl. 1): S-618
  Google Scholar
• 13. Gibson G.R.: Fibre and effects on probiotics (the prebiotic concept).Clin. Nutr. Suppl., 2004; 1: 25-31
  Google Scholar
• 14. Goni I., Garcia-Diz L., Manas E., Saura-Calixto F.: Analysis of resistantstarch: a method for foods and food products. Food Chem.,1996; 56: 445-449
  Google Scholar
• 15. Gonzalez-Soto R.A., Sanchez-Hernandez L., Solorza-Feria J.,Nunez-Santiago C., Flores-Huicochea E., Bello-Perez L.A.: Resistantstarch production from non-conventional starch sources by extrusion.Food Sci. Technol. Int., 2006; 12: 5-11
  Google Scholar
• 16. Haralampu S.G.: Resistant starch – a review of the physicalproperties and biological impact of RS3. Carbohydr. Polym., 2000;41: 285-292
  Google Scholar
• 17. Hopkins M.J., Cummings J.H., Macfarlane G.T.: Inter-species differencesin maximum specific growth rates and cell yields of bifidobacteriacultured on oligosaccharides and other simple carbohydratesources. J. Appl. Microbiol., 1998; 85: 381-386
  Google Scholar
• 18. Jochym K., Kapusniak J., Barczynska R., Śliżewska K.: New starchpreparations resistant to enzymatic digestion. J. Sci. Food Agric.,2012; 92: 886-891
  Google Scholar
• 19. Kapelko M., Zięba T., Golachowski A., Gryszkin A.: Effect of theproduction method on the properties of RS3/RS4 type resistantstarch. Part 1: Properties of retrograded starch (RS3) produced undervarious conditions and its susceptibility to acetylation. FoodChem., 2012; 135: 1494-1504
  Google Scholar
• 20. Kapelko M., Zięba T., Michalski A.: Effect of the production methodon the properties of RS3/RS4 type resistant starch. Part 2. Effectof a degree of substitution on the selected properties of acetylatedretrograded starch. Food Chem., 2012; 135: 2035-2042
  Google Scholar
• 21. Kapuśniak J., Barczyńska R., Śliżewska K., Libudzisz Z.: Utilizationof resistant dextrins by Lactobacillus bacteria. Zesz. Probl. Post.Nauk. Roln., 2008; 530: 445-457
  Google Scholar
• 22. Kapuśniak J., Jochym K., Barczyńska R., Śliżewska K., LibudziszZ.: Preparation and characteristics of resistant dextrins from potatostarch. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk. Roln., 2008; 530: 427-444
  Google Scholar
• 23. Konturek P.C., Sliwowski Z., Koziel J., Ptak-Belowska A., BurnatG., Brzozowski T., Konturek S.J.: Probiotic bacteria Escherichia colistrain Nissle 1917 attenuates acute gastric lesions induced by stress.J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 2009; 60 (Suppl. 6): 41-48
  Google Scholar
• 24. Kordyl M.: The ability of microorganisms to metabolize intestinalprebiotic preparations. Ph.D. thesis. Technical University ofLodz 2010
  Google Scholar
• 25. Kwon S.K., Chung K.M., Shin S.I., Moon T.W.: Contents of indigestiblefraction, water solubility, and color of pyrodextrins madefrom waxy sorghum starch. Cereal Chem., 2005; 82: 101-104
  Google Scholar
• 26. Lefranc-Millot C., Wils D., Neut C., Saniez-Degrave M.H.: Effectsof a soluble fiber, with excellent tolerance, NUTRIOSE® 06, on the gutecosystem: a review. Proceedings of the Dietary Fibre Conference,Helsinki, Finland 2006
  Google Scholar
• 27. Leszczyński W.: Resistant starch – classification, structure, production.Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 2004; 13/54: 37-50
  Google Scholar
• 28. Matsuda I., Satouchi M.: Agent for promoting the proliferationof Bifidobacterium. 1997, U.S. Patent No. 5698437
  Google Scholar
• 29. O’Hara A.M., Shanahan F.: Gut microbiota: mining for therapeuticpotential. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 2007; 5: 274-284
  Google Scholar
• 30. Ohkuma K., Hanno Y., Inada K., Matsuda I., Katsuda Y.: Process forpreparing dextrin containing food fiber. 1997, U.S. Patent 5620873 A
  Google Scholar
• 31. Ohkuma K., Wakabayashi S.: Fibersol-2: a soluble, non-digestible,starch-derived dietary fibre. In: Advanced Dietary Fibre Technology,ed.: B.V. McCleary, L. Prosky. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford,2001, pp. 509-523
  Google Scholar
• 32. Olano-Martin E., Gibson G.R., Rastall R.A.: Comparison of the invitro bifidogenic properties of pectins and pectic-oligosaccharides.J. Appl. Microbiol., 2002; 93: 505-511
  Google Scholar
• 33. Ouwehand A., Vesterlund S.: Health aspects of probiotics. IDrugs,2003; 6: 573-580
  Google Scholar
• 34. Palframan R., Gibson G.R., Rastall R.A.: Development of a quantitativetool for the comparison of the prebiotic effect of dietaryoligosaccharides. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 2003; 37: 281-284
  Google Scholar
• 35. Pasman W., Wils D., Santiez M.H., Kardinaal A.: Long term gastrointestinaltolerance of NUTRIOSE® FB in healthy men. Eur. J. Clin.Nutr., 2006; 60: 1024-1034
  Google Scholar
• 36. Roturier J.M., Looten P.H.: Nutroise: analytical aspects. ProceedingsThe Dietary Fibre Conference, Helsinki, Finland 2006
  Google Scholar
• 37. Saulnier D.M., Spinler J.K., Gibson G.R., Versalovic J.: Mechanismsof probiosis and prebiosis: considerations for enhanced functionalfoods. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2009; 20: 135-141
  Google Scholar
• 38. Slavin J.: Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefitsreceived. Nutrients, 2013; 5: 1417-1435
  Google Scholar
• 39. Wang J., Jin Z., Yuan X.: Preparation of resistant starch fromstarch-guar gum extrudates and their properties. Food Chem., 2007;101: 20-25
  Google Scholar
• 40. Wang Y.J., Kozlowski R., Delgado G.A.: Enzyme resistant dextrinsfrom high amylose corn mutant starches. Starch-Starke, 2001; 53:21-26
  Google Scholar
• 41. Wynne A.G., McCartney A.L., Brostoff J., Hudspith B.N., GibsonG.R.: An in vitro assessment of the effects of broad-spectrum antibioticson the human gut microflora and concomitant isolationof a Lactobacillus plantarum with anti-Candida activities. Anaerobe,2004; 10: 165-169
  Google Scholar

Pełna treść artykułu